Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(Download) "State Florida v. Margaret Elaine Harwood and Steward Carl Stamper" by Fifth District District Court of Appeal of Florida " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

State Florida v. Margaret Elaine Harwood and Steward Carl Stamper

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: State Florida v. Margaret Elaine Harwood and Steward Carl Stamper
  • Author : Fifth District District Court of Appeal of Florida
  • Release Date : January 22, 1986
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 76 KB

Description

We affirm the order of the trial court suppressing the evidence in this case on the ground that the disputed testimony supports the trial court's finding that there were no articulable facts and rational inferences therefrom which would support the stop of the defendants or the subsequent warrantless search of their lawfully parked automobile. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968); § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). See also State v. Hunt, 391 So.2d 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The State also appeals from an order entered by the trial court assessing legal costs incurred by the defendant (later determined to be attorney's fees in the amount of $225) against the Office of the State Attorney because the assistant state attorney arrived 17 minutes late for the hearing on defendants' motion to suppress evidence.1{/Cite} We know of no authority by which a trial court may assess a defendant's attorney's fees against the State Attorney, nor have we been cited to any such authority. If the court was of the opinion that the failure of the assistant state attorney to appear on time was an offense against the authority or dignity of the court, the procedure prescribed by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 for direct criminal contempt should have been followed. See Porter v. Williams, 392 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Even then, any sanction imposed would not be for the benefit of the defendant. Because there was no attempt made to follow the procedure outlined in that rule, the order assessing attorney's fees against the Office of the State Attorney must be reversed. The case is remanded to the trial court for such further procedure as the trial court deems warranted, not inconsistent with this opinion.


PDF Ebook Download "State Florida v. Margaret Elaine Harwood and Steward Carl Stamper" Online ePub Kindle